Chapter 1 of Perry's book tells the
story of his first child client, Tina, who endured sexual abuse during crucial
developmental years, resulting in delayed development and trauma
responses. When reading this chapter,
there are a few instances where I find that I relate to Perry's experiences. First, I find it puzzling that the new therapists,
the ones who are in training, are the clinicians that are working with arguably
the most vulnerable clients. When
looking at Tina's case, Perry was new to providing therapy to children in
general, and he was given a case in which there were multiple systemic
vulnerabilities at play. Specifically, Tina
and her family presumably (as I only know the information given in the book,
these factors are being assumed) encountered stressors such as socioeconomic
status, racism, sexism, sexual abuse, potentially domestic violence and
more. I empathize with Perry as carrying
the weight of a client this vulnerable as a new clinician feels daunting and
sometimes even too much to hold.
Luckily, Perry was able to garner important
lessons from his experiences working with Tina, specifically around
supervision. Perry was able to recognize
the value of his supervision and thankfully had supervision that was guiding
and supportive. I also admired that he
challenged the ideas and supervision he received and didn’t necessarily take
the first information that was given to him.
He sought out help from multiple perspectives and adapted in order to
provide the best care to his client.
Towards the end to the chapter,
Perry reflects on progress (or lack thereof) with Tina, specifically related to
her sexual behavior. He states that two
weeks before he left the clinic, Tina was caught engaging in sexual behavior at
school. He then goes on to discuss what
he did wrong, or even feeling duped by her progress. He expressed himself almost as if he felt
tricked by Tina and even states that she had just learned to “hide” these
behaviors. Though this ending for Tina
was troubling, I found it interesting that Perry almost seems to put blame on
himself. He carried the weight of Tina’s
success or failure and felt strong counter-transference towards the end of
their work together. I am wondering if Perry was aware of this?
My response to Perry’s reaction is
this: We do what we can to support our clients and also, our client’s actions
are not in our control. Additionally, I
am curious if he thought about how his termination with Tina affected her behavior. It seemed to me that Perry took Tina’s
behaviors as a reflection upon himself as a clinician and assumed that she had
been hiding these behaviors all along.
However, could this have possibly been a one-time occurrence potentially
brought on by the stress of knowing that the only safe adult male figure in her
life was leaving? Perry is correct in
thinking that Tina still had much more work to do around her stress responses
and behaviors (the outcome of this chapter highlights this), but I would not
discount all of the work that Tina did in her weekly sessions with Perry. She went into a room week after week with a
male stranger and learned what safety can look and feel like. She progressed quickly in her treatment and her
actions at the end of the therapeutic relationship are not a reflection of
Perry but rather, they are a reflection of the abuse and trauma that she
endured by the hands of another individual.
Yes to all of this! I wholeheartedly agree with your wisdom here and appreciate that you pointed out a lot of the things I did as well because 'hello universality'. I was actually surprised too that he blamed himself for not having done a "better job" of "curing" Tina. I think that he did the best he could with what he had and Tina unfortunately has a lot of work to do still, but that doesn't mean that their time together was fruitless. I agree that there was progress too and that perhaps Tina had only committed this one act of rebelliousness because of the imminent termination of their relationship. It's hard to tell but I was also really bummed about how he didn't make an effort to connect the family to other resources before he left. I'm anxious to know how her story turned out because from my experience, adults think that when they're speaking to kids/teens, what they say goes in one ear and out the other but you just never know what a ripple effect if will have on them later in life so it's always best to just play it safe and keep on being a positive role model.
ReplyDeleteTaylor,
ReplyDeleteYou brought up such an important point about successful and meaningful closure with clients, especially youth who have been affected by trauma. Dr. Perry didn’t seem to examine very closely if his termination with Tina somehow prompted anxiety, fear, mistrust (amongst other things) in her. We don’t know very much about his process with ending his treatment with her, but Perry seemed to glaze over such a critical transition for Tina that realistically could have incited so many things for her.
This is all to say, that I don’t believe Perry’s successful or unsuccessful termination was the cause of Tina’s actions, yet, there could have been some missed opportunities and re-traumatization in considering the impact that the termination would have on Tina. Like you said Taylor, this termination probably induced a lot of stress in Tina considering it was the first time she ever had a had a safe relationship with a male-figure and now after three years she had to say goodbye. I can imagine that she was flooded with so much anxiety over losing that relationship that she wasn’t able to cope with that stress. If Perry, didn’t begin the closing process with enough time that would have allowed Tina to respond, process, ask questions, expose fears in a safe manner, then he would have fallen in the same category for her as other men in her life. I would boldly say that it was his ethical responsibility to effectively and responsibly terminate the relationship, especially considering the impact and importance that his gender played into the therapeutic relationship.
Taylor, you brought up two interesting points that I completely missed. You mentioned, "the new therapists, the ones who are in training, are the clinicians that are working with arguably the most vulnerable clients". This made me take a step back and analyze my position as a clinician. Although I've been in social services for over five years, I have only been in a therapeutic role for less than a year and when I started my work with children, it was a new experience for me. Yet I was the one expected to work with these children experiencing poverty, neglect, and abuse. Personally, it's easy to forget that you're new in the field especially when you get comfortable in a position or at an agency so it is important to keep that at the front of your mind when working with vulnerable populations and maximize your time in seeking supervision.
ReplyDeleteThe second point you made was an excellent one. Could it be that Tina was affected because the only safe male figure in her life was leaving? I know many people children and adults who have started to act differently or some would say "act out" during the termination process, but if the clinician completed a thorough termination process, then there is nothing more that could do in regards to the client "acting out" and should not put the blame on themselves.
All helpful point, maybe Perry needed to address the termination from the introduction session?
DeleteHabanero Chilli Sauce - The Shoot Room ミスティーノ ミスティーノ 코인카지노 코인카지노 カジノ シークレット カジノ シークレット 메리트카지노 메리트카지노 10bet 10bet bk8 bk8 8 Online Sports Betting & Gambling | LACBet
ReplyDelete